|
|
 |
SURVEY RESULTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Thanks for all the feedback! More than 80 people wrote back about the two design solutions for the porch we presented last month. It was a 50/50 split for "traditional" vs "contemporary". . . here are some of the best responses.
Click here to see last month's survey.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
Jon Hatch, GRI, Graduate, Realtor Institute ABR, Accredited Buyer Representative EcoBroker
“OPTION DOS! TOO MUCH TRADITION HOGWASH OUT THERE ALREADY. #2 GIT ER DONE!” |
|
 |
|
Kevin Morningstar, General Contractor
“I am a big fan of contemporary, but 'option 1' seems to be a more solid design bringing together more of the elements, such as rooflines, from the existing house. Great 'faces' on both though and I love the planter boxes. Activate that street front.” |
|
 |
|
Keith Ahana, Big Sky R-Control, Denver, Colorado
“I like the contemporary design over the traditional. While the traditional design is nice, it is a bit on the conservative side for my taste. The entry on option 1 is a bit more grand and welcoming than option 2 with its pillars but the extra planter at the corner was big for me since it would soften the structure. The lines on option 2 are also a lot cleaner and I like the balance created by the side lights at the front door and the garage door windows. The sunshade at the big windows are a nice touch. Nice work Jacob.” |
|
 |
|
Todd Henderson, AIA Senior Associate, Boulder Associates
“First, I really love your all-encompassing awesomeness. You've got to be the best business development person an architectural firm has ever had. Brilliant emails, all of them! So, I'm surprised to find myself leaning toward the 'traditional' option 1, mostly because the composition seems to work better. Except for the flared columns at the entry, it's not really all that traditional, thankfully, in my opinion. Option 2 feels forced and out-of-place to me, even though I like a lot of the individual elements that make it up. If there's heartburn about proceeding with a less-than-fully-contemporary design, I'd suggest that it's maybe a false dichotomy in this case. I bet that option 1 could incorporate some elegant contemporary details." |
|
 |
|
Arn Rasker ReNove Construction
“Personally, I prefer option #2, for the following reasons:
In Option 2, I like the way the planters create a bit of visual isolation/protection to the porch, which will probably result in higher use of the porch as a place to hang-out. I like the integration of the window pattern next to the door with the windows in that garage door, provided by Option 2. I generally do not like "craftsman" style columns, such as those on the front of the home in Option 1, when they are applied to a non-craftsman style home. For that look to work, I believe a lot more would have to be done to the home to integrate it to the new columns. I like the relatively fresh look of the entry in Option 2. The change in texture/pattern/color of the siding material in Option 2 helps reduce the mass of the two story area; this applies to the darker color of the fireplace as well. Although further information might cause me to change my mind, I believe the window arrangement in Option 2 would allow more light into the entry/core of the home (I'm assuming there is a staircase just beyond the entry). Since I am biased towards natural lighting, I think I would lean away from the shading over the entry provided by Option 1. Although Option 2 is more contemporary than Option 1, it feels fairly restrained (not too modern) and should not clash with surrounding homes (assuming there are surrounding homes) of similar style to the original. In conclusion, both suggestions are an improvement over the original, as they both formalize the entry of the home, which I am assuming was one of the design goals of the process. Both designs do invite you more towards the front door, and create a more welcoming feel to the home.”
|
|
 |
|
Kim Knickerbocker, Center for ReSource Conservation
“I can see why your client is having a hard time choosing…they’d both be beautiful. I’m personally a fan of modern design but depending on the neighborhood it might be best to go the traditional route. If the client plans to sell in the next 5-10 years the traditional look would increase the chances of selling more quickly but probably at a lower price while the contemporary look might take a bit longer to sell but probably for a higher price based on its “designer” look. If it were me I’d probably go for the contemporary look.” |
|
 |
|
Scott Dale, Realtor, Scottsdale Properties
“I was never a huge fan of modern until I saw your designs. You have really brought me into that court. I prefer option 2 but would even suggest taking it a step further and wrapping the metal roof all the way around the porch, and exploring some interesting material on the planters (like steel, slate or some sort of stone-like green material).” |
|
 |
|
The homeowner selected the "traditional" option. |
|
|
|
 |
|
The Candy Shop has 2 desks available. |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
1720 15th Street, Boulder
Full-time rate: $525 or $495.
One, two and three day rates also available.
Come work with us!
Call Brandy at 303 442 3700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VaST offers architecture, site planning, interior design, space planning, LEED consulting, landscape and signage design services for commercial and residential clients. Our dedicated team provides the technical expertise and creative skill to help every client realize a project that melds their needs and desires. Our Objective design the most appropriate, stylish and energy-efficient project for the budget. |
|
|
|
| 1720 15TH STREET BOULDER CO 80302 |
 |
303 442 3700 |
 |
|
|
|